Here’s the thing with the BBC, right. They can post an article like this entirely uncritically. This is the problem with attempting to maintain an unbiased reportage – it makes you scared of making the obvious responses, such as: “If you want an uncomplicated intelligence-sharing relationship, stop fucking torturing people. We don’t let Libya do it so why should you?”
Also, wtf White House. I thought that the Republicans were the torture-apologist party in the US?
Intelligence derived through torture is illegal under international law. Not Iraq-war illegal; actually illegal, in that most civilised countries have extremely tight laws in place to prevent its admission. I, for one, am pleased that our courts have overturned the decision of that gutless, venal slime of a Foreign Secretary and have staked their colours to the wall on this.
Edit to add: Liberal Conspiracy identifies Britain’s worst journalist on the basis of this. Come back BBC, all is forgiven. Ish.
Related posts
- Snow plot, last post from me on this I promise
- Food and trade
- Uh-oh, spaghetti-os!
- The thing left unsaid
- A good week in Iran
- The Revolutionary Guard
- Haters gonna hate
- Hosni
- The food crisis
- From porn to politics











